Help us to cut tax for working people
Friday, February 17th, 2012 by aldcadmin
In tough times, the Liberal Democrats believe you should keep more of the money that you earn. That’s why the Liberal Democrats have long called for the tax-free threshold raised to £10,000 – giving you a tax cut when you need it most.
Liberal Democrat plans would save working people £700 a year –that’s an extra £60 in your wages every month. And more than 3.5million older and low-paid people will be freed from paying any income tax altogether. This is a plan we put on the front page of our General Election manifesto and it went into the Coalition Agreement.
We have already started putting this in to practice.
In April last year, millions of ordinary working people were given a £200 annual tax cut and since last April 800,000 low paid people no longer pay any income tax at all. But we believe our tax cuts need to happen faster and go further. And we want your help in making it happen.
Ahead of the Budget next month, Nick Clegg and Liberal Democrats in the government will be pushing to speed up our tax plans. Please join this campaign and sign the petition which is on the Number 10 website here.
Liberal Democrats want tax cuts for working people, not the rich. Please help us to make that happen.
£1 Billion to tackle youth unemployment
Friday, November 25th, 2011 by aldcadmin
Lib Dem Leader and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has outlined a £1 billion pound Youth Contract to tackle youth unemployment. The aim is to ensure that all jobless young people are earning or learning again before long-term damage is done.
- Over three years, the Youth Contract will provide at least 410,000 new work places for 18 to 24 year olds into work. Starting April 2012
- Including 160,000 wage subsidies and 250,000 new work experience placements.
- In addition, there will be at least 20,000 more incentive payments to encourage employers to take on young apprentices.
- A new programme to help the most disengaged 16 and 17 year olds – getting them back to school or college, onto an apprenticeship or into a job with training.
Local Christmas Celebrations Update
Posted November 9, 2011
We were shocked as local residents when we heard that Leeds City Council announced in May that they were not willing to fund the Christmas illuminations in our area, and were cancelling the traditional Switch On Ceremony on Commercial Street. To add insult to injury they announced that the Leeds City Centre lights and Switch on were being prioritised instead.
My colleague, Don Wilson, took the lead on this, determined that Christmas would not be cancelled in our area. First he secured the funding locally to make sure our communities got their traditional lights:
June Press Release: Christmas saved by local Councillors
Councillor Donald Wilson (Lib Dem, Rothwell) today announced the plans that are afoot to save Christmas lights. The proposals would see Christmas trees and lights brighten up streets in Commercial Street, Rothwell weeks after the Council announced they were pulling the plug. Cllr Wilson has asked to use the South (Outer) Area Committee’s own money to ensure that Christmas gets the go-ahead. The total earmarked for the Christmas light fund is £4,480 across the Rothwell area. Cllr Wilson said:
“Getting our lights cut by the Civic Hall was a body blow locally and the local Councillors knew we had to solve this problem locally.
“It has been said time and again that Christmas lights are important for the local community in Rothwell. The total cost is good value for money for our residents. They encourage people to shop in the local area and they cheer the town up during the darkest time of the year.
“Rothwell is used to being overlooked by the Council but we have a tradition of these popular community events being taken on by volunteers. We’re discussing how to tackle the switch on event, but needless to say we will be doing our utmost to ensure that the hundreds of residents that turn out will be treated to a show.”
The funding ensured that there would still be “Carols Round the Tree” in Woodlesford, Carlton and outside Rothwell One Stop Shop. The only task to complete was seeing whether a Switch On Ceremony could be organised. Don discussed the matter immediately with the Rothwell & District Carnival Committee. Although worn out after organising the best Summer Carnival yet, the Group agreed to look at it, knowing how important the event is to the community and to traders. Happily for us, they did not hesitate for long, and have taken on the challenge of a Christmas Carnival that promises to be quite an event. The Christmas Carnival will see a street market, entertainment , fun fair rides, and a brass band, all following on from the Christmas Fair at the Blackburn Hall on the same day, Saturday 26th November.
I understand that Aire Valley Homes have generously given a grant, and that this, added to the money the Carnival Committee raised at an excellent Quiz Night at the Blackburn Hall,should be enough to pay for a fireworks display, so the evening will finish with the traditional bang. A big thank you from the Lib Dem team to the Carnival Committee volunteers for making this happen.
Dolphin Manor
Posted October 26, 2011
It is a few weeks now since the Council decided not to take forward its proposals to shut down Dolphin Manor residential home. The residents can now finally feel secure in the place they are very proud to call home. It took a lot of hard work from a great many people to prove to the Council the level of anger there was in our area. In the end we finally got across that being looked after locally, in the midst of family and friends close at hand, is just as important as the bricks and mortar of a building.
The Council was forced to admit that there was not any alternative private accommodation in the area for those elderly facing being turfed out. That is why they have relented and allowed residents to stay on for now, but the Council has confirmed that they will withdraw from providing Council care on this site, as soon as an alternative is provided.
The Council’s preference was originally for the private sector to take over responsibility for the supply of residential accommodation as the Council withdrew. The activists acting to save Dolphin Manor soon realised that in the face of a Council determined to withdraw, that they would be best seeking to take over Dolphin Manor as a community trust. This would save the present building, protect staff interests, and keep the elderly residential provision small scale and intimate. All local councillors backed this option, and the Council has agreed to transfer Dolphin Manor to the Community subject to them agreeing that the Trust’s business case adds up.
The problem is, of course, that the people judging whether or not the business case stacks up are the same people who insisted that they could not see a way how services could be provided at better value for money. It is notoriously difficult to persuade the Council to hand over a significant asset to the community, but I am committed to ensuring that the significant local talent that is coming together to form this Trust gets the support and recognition that they deserve from the Council.
This is in the knowledge that should the Council consider the Trust to be unworkable, the other option on the table is for the land to be identified for a 60 bed private to be built, and then close not just Dolphin Manor, but also Home Lea which the Council classifies as “Subject to further review”.
So, although the current residents can be assured of a staying in their home, local to their families, there is still considerable uncertainty for our community about who is to provide and be responsible for our elderly in the not too distant future.
One thing that is certain, a decision on whether the Council is backing the Community Trust or not, must be taken within the next six months. The community originally learned the bad news about Dolphin Manor just days after the last election. To delay another key decision until the election is safely out of the way will destroy any faith left that many still have in the Council’s decision making.
Rothwell Allotments
Posted October 13, 2011
I have been contacted by many concerned allotment holders and residents after the For Sale signs went up at the Victoria and Reservoir Allotment Sites in Rothwell. Land Agents Strutt & Parker are working on behalf of the Lord Mowbray Estate to sell both allotment sites.
Both sites are currently leased by Leeds City Council for allotment use, and this is a continuation of the leases originally set up by Rothwell Urban District Council before the First World War.
The Reservoir site was offered to Leeds City Council to buy a couple of years back, and officers asked local councillors for our views. We wholeheartedly supported the purchase, so you can imagine our surprise to discover that this transaction had not happened, and the site was once again being advertised for sale. Furthermore, the Council were thinking twice about buying the land, as ‘Rothwell had too many allotments’. I can confirm that after discussions I recently had with senior officers, they are now committed to buying the land.
If only this were so for the Victoria Site. The Council have told me that they could not afford the price that is being asked for the site, and that the site was Statutory Allotment land, so the plotholders were protected. As many of you know, I am a keen allotment grower, and I’m active in the Leeds & District Gardeners Federation. I used this hat to contact the National Society of Allotment Gardeners to seek their advice as to how we could best inform the Victoria Allotment plotholders of their rights if ownership of the site changed. It was at this point that it became clear that the site was not protected as Statutory allotment land, and the Council admitted this after looking more closely at the lease.
If any new owner chose to end the lease of the land for allotment use to Leeds City Council, then there would be nothing stopping the new owner in giving the plotholders just 12 months notice to quit the site. The only protection that is offered is that which is included in the Unitary Development Plan that guides planning decisions within Leeds:
Policy 1A of the UDP states:DEVELOPMENT OF LAND CURRENTLY USED AS ALLOTMENT GARDENS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN OUTDOOR RECREATION, UNLESS THE NEED IN THE LOCALITY FOR GREENSPACE IS ALREADY MET AND A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR ALLOTMENT GARDENS CAN BE IDENTIFIED.
The above guidance is fine if only we had to rely on the local Plans Panel to interpret it, but all too often, a landowner can appeal to the Planning Inspectorate, and often local decisions are overturned. That is why I have written to the Director of the Council department responsible for allotment provision to buy the land at Victoria. It is the only option to guarantee that the site is retained for allotment use, and that the 53 allotment growers can continue to tend their plots in which they have invested so much time and energy. The money raised from allotment rents in the city is around £120,000, and the Council spends less than that on its allotment service. The previous administration introduced a year on year capital budget of £75,000 to spend on the improvement of allotments. This was in recognition of the unpaid work that Allotment Associations put in to the upkeep of these valuable green lungs. The Labour-run Council has slashed that by two thirds. If the previous budget had been maintained, the purchase of Victoria allotments would have happened by now. Even in an environment of reduced public spending, basic fairness says that the Council should sit back and let an allotment site be lost, when that Council already makes a profit out of its allotment holders.
Leeds incinerator u-turn criticised
Posted October 11, 2011
Leeds City Council has today selected its preferred bidder to build an incinerator in East Leeds.
Veolia will build a plant capable of processing 183,000 tonnes of waste a year on the old markets site at Cross Green. The council’s Exec Board will be asked to formally appoint Veolia as the council’s partner in the project when it meets in November.
The Council began its search for a firm to provide a solution for disposing of its waste in 2006, as landfill taxes were set to cost the Council more to handle its waste. It became clear that the best value bidders all included ‘Energy from Waste’ in their solutions, and the Council whittled down considered sites for the new plant to just two in the Aire Valley to the east of the city.
Liberal Democrat group leader Cllr Stewart Golton (Rothwell), expressed surprise at the decision given the ruling administration’s policy of opposition to incineration on any site in Leeds. He claimed the decision was a u-turn.
Cllr Stewart Golton said:
‘Labour candidates campaigned over several years against building an incinerator in the Aire Valley. Since taking power 18 months ago, the Labour Party have been very quiet on their waste policy. I assumed they were working hard on an alternative. Imagine my surprise that their alternative to an incinerator is…an incinerator!’
‘The Labour leader Keith Wakefield promised a local referendum on Incineration in 2008, and Labour candidates now elected in Burmantofts, Temple Newsam and Rothwell told local residents a vote for them was a vote against incineration. Although there was a lot of talk about potential dangerous emissions, I have been informed that no extra safety specifications have been asked for since the project passed to the new Labour administration, so I assume those concerns have now evaporated.’
The Liberal Democrats believe that circumstances have changed so significantly, that the Council should step back and reconsider whether its first priority should be to build an incinerator of its own.
‘People tell us that they want to recycle as much as possible. The collection of food waste is a roaring success in Rothwell, and if spread to the rest of the city could make significant improvements to our recycling performance.’
At the same time the commercial operator, Biffa has plans to build their own Energy from Waste’ facility in the Aire Valley. Although intended to cater for commercial waste, they have already stated that they have the capacity to handle the city’s domestic waste. Questions are being asked whether a second incinerator is therefore even necessary.
Nick Clegg’s speech to Liberal Democrat Conference 2011
Wednesday, September 21st, 2011 by aldcadmin
Deputy Prime Minister addresses the Party Conference in Birmingham. You can read the full text of the speech here.
In Government, on your side
Wednesday, September 21st, 2011 by aldcadmin
Lib Dems: Cut taxes for ordinary people, not the richest
Thursday, September 8th, 2011 by aldcadmin
The Lib Dems are opposing calls for an immediate cut in the 50% tax rate paid by higher rate taxpayers.
Nick Clegg’s party instead wants to give more help to those on middle and low incomes who need it the most.
Lib Dem Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander said, “At a time when the whole country faces serious financial challenges, the priority needs to be people on low and middle incomes.”
A key part of the coalition agreement was the Lib Dem commitment to making taxes fairer. The Lib Dems are well on their way to delivering on their pledge that no one should pay tax on the first £10,000 they earn.
Nearly a million low paid workers are no longer paying income tax thanks to this. All basic rate tax payers are paying £200 less in income tax.
Each year more and more people on low and middle incomes will gain more thanks to the Lib Dem fairer tax plan.
Danny Alexander said, “Fairer taxes is our goal. I don’t see why, in the next parliament, we shouldn’t be trying to get to a situation where people in a full-time job on the minimum wage are paying no income tax at all.”
This would mean that no one would pay tax on the first £12,500 they earn.
Fighting for a better NHS
Thursday, September 1st, 2011 by aldcadmin
The Lib Dems are continuing to work in Parliament to ensure NHS reforms deliver a better deal for patients.
Nick Clegg’s party won major changes to the reforms earlier this summer.
These included measures to ensure there will be no privatisation of the NHS and no special favours for the private sector.
Nick Clegg said, “With the Lib Dems, the NHS will always be free at the point of use and will deliver top quality treatment for patients. We want to deliver a better NHS that can cope with the increasing demand and rising health costs.”
The NHS reforms will cut waste and bureaucracy that costs billions of pounds. They will help the NHS cope with the costs of Britain’s steadily ageing population and the rising cost of many treatments.
By making the NHS more efficient and by protecting the NHS budget from cuts, more money can be spent on improving care for patients.
NHS faced disaster with Labour
Had Labour won the last election, the NHS would have faced deep spending cuts. That along with Labour’s refusal to tackle waste and inefficiency would have been a disaster for our health services.
Labour rigged the market in favour of the private sector by giving contracts that were unfair for the taxpayer and for patients.
Over £250million of taxpayers’ money was handed over by the last Labour government to private providers for operations they didn’t even perform.
The Liberal Democrats have made sure that this kind of favouritism towards the private sector will now be illegal.

Comments (0)


